Taking a Naturalistic Turn in the Health and Disease Debate by Jonathan Sholl & Simon Okholm


We situate the well-trodden debate about defining health and disease within the project of a metaphysics of science and its aim to work with and contribute to science. We make use of Guay and Pradeu’s ‘metaphysical box’ to reframe this debate, showing what is at stake in recent attempts to move beyond it, revealing unforeseen points of agreement and disagreement among new and old positions, and producing new questions that may lead to progress. We then discuss the implications of the two-way benefits between medicine and philosophy when the latter is driven and constrained by medical science.

Read more Sholl & Okholm 2021 – Taking a naturalistic turn in the health and disease debate.

Leave a comment